Skip to main content

Every open order, held against every supplier email.

Neil reads acknowledgements, ship notices and delay emails against every open purchase order line, and shows what changed and what it puts at risk. It drafts the chase or the reply; the buyer sends it and updates the ERP.

  1. Pencil drawing: a seal reads a letter at a table covered in envelopes, while one envelope with a red stamp lies on the floor under its chair.

    One missed email.

    An order that slips three weeks is often announced, in an email nobody answered.

  2. Pencil drawing: a seal ties small envelope tags to a row of binders on a shelf, one binder with a red tab.

    Neil reads the inbox against every open order.

    Acknowledgements, ship notices and delay messages, each matched to the order line it is about.

  3. Pencil drawing: a worried seal holding a letter points at a calendar where a crossed-out date has a red arrow down to a later circled date.

    It flags what changed, and what it breaks.

    A new date, a short shipment, a price that doesn’t match, and the production each one puts at risk.

  4. Pencil drawing: a seal types on a laptop beside a sheet with a red tick, as an envelope flies off.

    The buyer sends the chase.

    Neil drafts the reply. The buyer edits it, sends it and updates the ERP.

What the inbox holds that the ERP doesn’t.

Most messages confirm what the ERP already says. These are the ones that change it.

  • ERP
    20 November
    Supplier’s email
    11 December

    A new date nobody answered.

    Three weeks later, and 39 hours without a reply.

  • PO asks within
    2 business days
    Waiting
    9 days

    An order never acknowledged.

    PO 4500-1190: sent 27 October, and no reply in the inbox.

  • Ordered
    24 spools
    Ship notice
    18 spools

    A short shipment.

    $3,672 short, seen before the receipt shows it.

  • Purchase order
    $6.85
    Acknowledgement
    $7.33

    A price that doesn’t match.

    7% above the order, found before the invoice arrives: $5,760 on the line.

  • Asked
    30 October
    Answered
    Not yet

    A question holding up production.

    Without an answer by 6 November, the slot moves from week 47 to week 51.

One inbox, every open order.

Real Seal screens from a full test run: Acme Medical’s purchasing inbox and open orders, as of 06:00 on 5 November 2026.

  1. 1

    Every open order, and the five that need a reply.

    Before 06:00 Neil read the purchasing inbox against every open order line.

    The open orders board in Seal: five order lines that need a reply, each with its supplier, what the supplier said, the dock date in the ERP and the supplier’s latest date, above the replies Neil drafted, each not sent.
    1. What the supplier saidShort shipped, moved, not acknowledged, a question unanswered, a price that differs.
    2. The ERP’s date against the supplier’sPO 4500-1182: the ERP says 20 November. Acme Polymers wrote 11 December.
    3. Every reply, draftedTen drafts, each linked to the finding it answers.
  2. 2

    A new date in an email nobody answered.

    Acme Polymers moved PO 4500-1182 by three weeks on 3 November. The ERP still has the old date.

    Neil’s finding on PO 4500-1182 in Seal: who decides, the proposal, the supplier’s email and the ERP row as evidence, the order line and the material it affects, and the supplier’s words quoted.
    1. What Neil proposesReply today, and change the ERP’s date once it is agreed. Marcus Bell decides.
    2. The email and the ERP rowEach opened beside the finding.
    3. The supplier’s words, quoted“Delivery to Lowell Friday 11 December (was 20 November)”, sent 3 November at 14:47.
  3. 3

    The reply, drafted for the buyer.

    It asks for what the plan needs. Marcus Bell edits it and sends it.

    A draft reply in Seal to Brenda Kowalski at Acme Polymers about PO 4500-1182, linked to its finding and not sent, asking for 7 bags by 20 November and the rest on 11 December, or supply from Geismar.
    1. To the supplier who wroteBrenda Kowalski at Acme Polymers, in the same thread.
    2. Not sentMarcus Bell edits it and sends it.
    3. What the plan needs7 bags by 20 November cover every work order until the rest arrives.

Email outruns the people reading it.

Copying a message into the ERP gets some values wrong, and the busier the inbox, the less gets answered.

People, by handPublished studies

6.57%
of values wrong when people abstract data from records by hand.Meta-analysis, Int. J. Medical Informatics, 2025
Under 5%
of the day’s email replied to at about 100 messages a day, from about 25% on light days.2 million webmail users, newsletters included, WWW 2015
26%
of replies and forwards made later, not when the email was first read.Email client logs, WSDM 2019

With NeilTest run, 5 November 2026

46
open order lines on 27 purchase orders, held against 150 emails.Acme Medical’s ERP and purchasing inbox
5 of 5
planted problems found.Built into the test run for Neil to find
19 of 19
numbers in the findings match the answer key.Dates, quantities and prices
0 of 3
decoys raised: a late, a short and a moved order the buyer had already accepted.Built into the test run for Neil to set aside

The buyer sends, and changes the order.

Neil reads, matches and drafts. It never sends an email, or places, changes or cancels an order. Each follow-up is kept with the message it answers and what the buyer did.

See which runs a late order reaches

Summary

The problem
A purchase order changes in the inbox long before it changes in the ERP: a new date, a short shipment, a price that doesn’t match. One unanswered email can move a production run by weeks.
Seal’s approach
Neil matches every supplier message to the order line it is about, compares it in code with the ERP, and shows what each change reaches downstream. It drafts the follow-up for the buyer.
What changes
Buyers start the day on the orders that changed, with the reply drafted, instead of searching the inbox for them.
Where to start
Three months of one buyer’s supplier email and the open-order exports from the same period. Book a demo.

1An order changes in the inbox first.

A purchase order is a promise: a quantity, a price and a date. Suppliers answer it in email. An acknowledgement confirms it or changes it, a ship notice says what is actually on the truck, a delay message moves the date, and a question waits for an answer before anything is made. None of these changes the ERP by itself. A buyer reads each one, works out which order line it is about, and updates the ERP by hand.

Both steps fail in familiar ways. People copying values from one document into another by hand get a share of them wrong: 6.57% in a meta-analysis of 93 studies.¹ The larger risk is the email that is never acted on. In a study of more than 2 million email users, the share of each day’s email people replied to fell from about a quarter on light days to under one in twenty at around 100 messages a day.² That count includes newsletters, so it measures overload, not missed orders. A delay announced in an email nobody answered reaches the plan when the material fails to arrive.

2Match every message to its order line.

Each morning Neil reads the purchasing inbox: acknowledgements, ship notices, delay messages, invoices and questions, in the body, in attachments and in the replies quoted below. Each message is matched to the order line it concerns, by order number, part, quantity, supplier and thread, and what it says is read into fields: a date, a quantity, a price, a question. A message Neil can’t match for certain is shown as unmatched, never guessed.

Reading is where an AI model helps, and where it still slips. In a 2025 preprint, the best model read 92.71% of fields correctly on scanned invoices and 96.50% on clean ones.³ So every value Neil reads keeps a link to the line of the email or the page of the attachment it came from, and an uncertain value is read twice.

3Compare in code with the ERP.

Then code compares each message with the ERP: the supplier’s date against the ERP’s, the quantity shipped against the quantity ordered, the price acknowledged against the price on the order, the days an order has gone unacknowledged and the days a supplier’s question has gone unanswered. Your buyers set how long is too long, for each supplier or material.

4Show what each change reaches.

A changed date matters by what depends on it. Neil follows each change to the materials, work orders and customer orders it reaches, from the same morning’s run as material demand planning and production schedule alignment. A three-week slip on a material with months of cover is a note. The same slip on a material that is already short is the first thing a buyer sees.

Email, 3 November

From
Acme Polymers
PO 4500-1182 delivers
11 December
Answered
No
Orders › PO 4500-1182
Changed
ERP date
20 November
At risk
WO-31877, PEBA 72D
Draft
Partial by 20 November
Figure 1. An email of 3 November moves PO 4500-1182 to 11 December while the ERP still shows 20 November. Seal shows the work order it puts at risk and a drafted request for a partial shipment

5Five messages at Acme Medical.

Acme Medical is a fictional ISO 13485 maker of tubing and catheter components with nine regular suppliers and two buyers. On Thursday 5 November 2026, Neil’s 06:00 run raised five orders from the purchasing inbox.

SupplierWhat the message saidWhat Neil drafted
Acme PolymersPO 4500-1182 delivers on 11 December, not 20 November. Sent 3 November, unansweredA request for a partial shipment by 20 November, or stock from another plant
Acme PackagingNothing: PO 4500-1190 for sterile barrier pouches, unacknowledged after 9 daysA chase
Acme WireA ship notice for PO 4500-1171 lists 18 spools of the 24 orderedA question about the other 6. The ERP doesn’t show the partial
Acme FluoropolymersThe acknowledgement of PO 4500-1179 prices the liner 7% above the orderA query on the price before the invoice arrives
Acme CompoundingA question of 30 October about colour specification revision C, unanswered for 6 daysA reply for the buyer. The supplier’s production slot depends on it

The first matters most. PO 4500-1182 is the PEBA 72D meant to cover Acme Vascular’s ramp, and the ERP still shows 20 November. At the new date the material runs short, and the work order that needs it can’t run as planned.

6The buyer sends the follow-up.

Neil drafts; the buyer decides. A draft opens beside the message it answers, the order line and the ERP’s figures. The buyer edits it, sends it from their own mailbox and updates the ERP. Neil never sends an email, and never places, changes or cancels an order.

Agents left to work through email alone are not there yet: in a 2026 preprint, the best agent completed 33.5% of realistic email tasks, though 99.7% of its tool calls ran without error.⁴ Neil’s part is the reading, the comparison and the draft. The judgement and the send stay with the buyer.

Each follow-up is kept with the message it answers and what the buyer did. FDA does not routinely inspect component makers;⁵ it relies on device makers to control what they buy, and those device makers ask their suppliers for the record.

7Validate it on three months of mail.

Take three months of one buyer’s supplier email and the open-order exports from the start of that period. Neil reads the mail as if each day were live. Compare what it matched and raised with what the buyer did and what the ERP showed at the end: the dates that moved, the partial shipments, the prices that changed and the questions that waited.

Count what Neil raised in time, what it missed and what it raised that didn’t matter, and have the buyer read the drafts as they would a colleague’s.

8Start with one buyer’s inbox.

Bring three months of one buyer’s supplier email, exported, with the open-order and receipt exports from the same period. No live access to the mailbox or the ERP is needed to prove it.

References

  1. 1Garza et al., Error rates of data processing methods in clinical research: a systematic review and meta-analysis, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2025: medical record abstraction had a pooled error rate of 6.57% across 93 studies. DOI
  2. 2Kooti et al., Evolution of conversations in the age of email overload, WWW 2015: across more than 2 million webmail users, people replied to about 25% of the day’s email at low load and less than 5% at about 100 emails a day. DOI
  3. 3Berghaus et al., arXiv preprint, 2025: the best model tested extracted 96.50% of fields correctly on clean invoices and 92.71% on scanned invoices. arXiv
  4. 4EmailBench, arXiv preprint, 2026: the best-performing configuration passed 33.5% of 206 enterprise email and productivity scenarios, despite 99.7% of its tool calls completing without an observed API failure. arXiv
  5. 5FDA, CDRH Learn, Purchasing Controls: FDA inspections often only extend to the finished device manufacturers, and FDA does not perform routine inspections of component manufacturers. FDA

AConnected across Seal

BCapabilities

CapabilityWhat it covers
Inbox matchingMatch every supplier message to the purchase order line it is about, by order number, part, quantity, supplier and thread.
Message readingRead dates, quantities, prices and questions from email bodies, attachments and quoted replies, each linked to its line.
ERP comparisonCompare each message in code with the ERP: dates, quantities, prices and the days an order has gone unacknowledged.
Downstream reachFollow each change to the materials, work orders and customer orders it puts at risk.
Drafted follow-upsDraft the chase, reply or request for the buyer to edit and send. Neil sends nothing.
Waiting questionsRaise supplier questions that have waited longer than your buyers allow.
Follow-up recordsKeep each message with its order line, the comparison, the draft and what the buyer did.

CConnected records

Entity
What it records
Kind
Supplier
A supplier of purchased material, with its contacts and the thresholds your buyers set for it.
type
Purchase Order Line
An open order line in the ERP: part, quantity, price and date.
type
PO 4500-1182
PEBA 72D natural, still dated 20 November in the ERP.
instance
Supplier Message
An email or attachment as received, with its thread.
type
Order Acknowledgement
A supplier’s confirmation of an order, sometimes with a new date, quantity or price.
template
Ship Notice
What a supplier has shipped against an order, and when.
template
Delay Notice
A supplier’s new date for an order, often in a reply to something else.
template
Acme Polymers, 3 November
Moves PO 4500-1182 from 20 November to 11 December. Unanswered.
instance
Message Reading
A date, quantity, price or question read from a message, linked to the line it came from.
type
Order Change
Where a message differs from the ERP, and the materials and work orders the difference reaches.
type
11 December, not 20 November
Puts PEBA 72D cover and work order WO-31877 at risk.
instance
Follow-up Draft
A chase, reply or request drafted for the buyer.
type
Buyer Action
What the buyer did: the message sent, the ERP updated, or no action and why.
type

DQuestions and answers

Does Neil email our suppliers?

No. Neil drafts the chase or the reply. The buyer edits it and sends it from their own mailbox. Neil sends nothing.

Does Neil update the ERP when a supplier moves a date?

No. It shows the supplier’s date beside the ERP’s, with the email it came from and what the change puts at risk. The buyer updates the ERP.

Does this replace our ERP’s purchasing?

No. Orders are placed, changed and received in the ERP as they are now. Neil reads its exports and the inbox, and prepares the follow-up.

What data does a proof need?

Three months of one buyer’s supplier email, exported, with the open-order and receipt exports from the same period. No live access to the mailbox or the ERP is needed.

What if a message doesn’t give the order number?

Neil matches it by part, quantity, supplier and thread. A message it can’t match for certain is shown as unmatched, for the buyer to place.

Is our data used to train AI models?

Under Seal’s agreements, your data is not used to train the underlying AI models.

Our customers audit our purchasing. What is kept?

Each message as received, the order line it was matched to, the comparison with the ERP, the draft, and what the buyer did and when. Decisions stay with people.

See your process in Seal.

Bring a procedure or a recurring problem. See how your team configures it with Neil and improves the next run.

Book a demo