neil turns your SOPs, master batch records, forms, and spreadsheets into validated, running Seal workflows. He proposes the build as a change set. Your team reviews and signs. Your operators execute, with audit trails and e-signatures built in.
Send a document and neil proposes the templates, fields, workflows, review gates, and validation checks it describes. Nothing goes live on neil's say-so: every proposal is a change set with a full diff, and validation evidence is generated from the build.
4.1 Add 47.7 g of sodium acetate trihydrate to approximately 800 mL of WFI and stir until fully dissolved.
4.2 Adjust pH to 5.2 ± 0.1 with glacial acetic acid.
4.3 QS to 1.0 L with WFI. Record lot numbers of all materials.
5.1 Verify conductivity is 8–12 mS/cm at 25 °C. A second operator shall verify each weight.
6.1 Record all values in the batch record. QA review is required before release.
Validation reports, CTD modules, approved specs. The output is structured data: specs, test names, acceptance criteria, methods. Not summary text.
Describe your operation — sterile injectables, three lines, FDA + EU Annex 1 — and neil drafts the configuration. Your team reviews and approves.
OOS, deviation, and CAPA first drafts with context pre-populated and likely causes surfaced from your history. Investigators start with hypotheses, not blank pages.
Parameter drift across batches, recurring root causes, training gaps. Signals from live execution data, before they become findings.
Regulated work keeps humans in the loop. Seal enforces it: every proposal waits for review and an e-signature before it goes live.
neil is named after Neil the Seal, the Tasmanian elephant seal famous for blocking roads, stealing traffic cones, and ignoring authority entirely. Ours reads SOPs and respects review gates. Both are beloved. Only one is under change control.







.webp)
.webp)

.webp)