1Minimum retention periods at a glance.
The period depends on the product, the jurisdiction and, for investigational products, the clinical trial. These are the minimums the rules set.
| Product | Rule | Batch records kept for at least |
|---|---|---|
| US finished drugs | 21 CFR 211.180(a) | 1 year after the batch’s expiry date; 3 years after distribution for certain OTC products exempt from expiry dating |
| US components, containers, closures and labelling | 21 CFR 211.180(b) | 1 year after the expiry date; 3 years after distribution of the last lot using them, for those OTC products |
| US licensed biologics | 21 CFR 600.12(b) | 5 years after the records of manufacture are completed or 6 months after the latest expiry date, whichever is later |
| US cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps) | 21 CFR 1271.270(d) | 10 years after the record is created, and 10 years after the product’s administration |
| EU authorised medicines | Directive (EU) 2017/1572, Article 9 | 1 year after expiry or 5 years after QP certification, whichever is longer |
| EU investigational medicines | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1569, Article 8(3) | 5 years after the last clinical trial using the batch ends or is discontinued |
| Active substances (APIs) | ICH Q7, section 6.13 | 1 year after expiry; 3 years after complete distribution for APIs with retest dates |
2What 21 CFR 211.180 requires.
Section 211.180(a) applies to “any production, control, or distribution record” that Part 211 requires and that “is specifically associated with a batch of a drug product”. It must be kept for at least one year after the batch’s expiry date or, for certain OTC products exempt from expiry dating under 211.137, three years after the batch is distributed. Section 211.180(b) sets the same periods for records of components, containers, closures and labelling; for those OTC products, the three years run from distribution of the last lot that used them.¹
The rest of the section governs how records are kept. Under 211.180(c), records must be “readily available for authorized inspection during the retention period at the establishment where the activities described in such records occurred”; records that can be immediately retrieved from another location electronically meet that requirement. Under 211.180(d), records may be kept as originals or as true copies, such as photocopies or microfilm. Section 211.180(e) requires records to be kept so their data can be used to evaluate each product’s quality standards at least annually.¹
Other US rules set their own periods for some products. Licensed biologics keep records long enough to permit the return of clinical reports of unfavourable reactions, and for at least five years after the records of manufacture are completed or six months after the latest expiry date, whichever is later.² Establishments handling human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products keep records for 10 years after creation, and records for a particular product for at least 10 years after its administration, or after its distribution, disposition or expiry, whichever is latest, if the administration date is not known.³ For investigational drugs, the IND sponsor keeps its records of the drug’s receipt, shipment and disposition, including the batch or code mark of each shipment, for two years after a marketing application is approved or, if none is approved, until two years after investigational shipment stops and FDA has been notified.⁴
3What EU law requires.
For human medicines, Article 9 of Commission Directive (EU) 2017/1572, which repealed Directive 2003/94/EC, requires a documentation system that will “enable the history of the manufacture of each batch to be traced”, and requires the manufacturer to retain the batch documentation “for at least 1 year after the expiry date of the batches to which it relates or at least 5 years after the certification” by the Qualified Person, “whichever is the longer period”.⁵
For investigational medicinal products, Article 8(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1569 requires the manufacturer to retain the product specification file and batch documentation “for at least five years after the completion or discontinuation of the last clinical trial in which the batch was used”.⁶
Chapter 4 of the EU GMP guide, in operation since 30 June 2011, repeats both periods in section 4.11 and goes further for other records. Critical documentation, including raw data that supports the marketing authorisation, should be kept while the authorisation is in force. Raw data superseded by a full new data set may be retired with a documented justification, but process validation raw data should be kept at least as long as the records of every batch released on the basis of that validation.⁷
4How the APIs rule works with retest dates.
ICH Q7 asks for production, control and distribution records to be kept for at least one year after the batch’s expiry date, and, for APIs with retest dates, “for at least 3 years after the batch is completely distributed”. During that time, originals or copies should be readily available where the activities took place, and records may be kept as originals or as true copies, such as photocopies or microfilm.⁸
The ICH Q7 questions and answers of June 2015 explain “completely distributed” as distribution of the entire batch by the API manufacturer to the next party in the supply chain, or of the received quantity for agents, brokers and distributors. They say the intent is to keep records for as long as the API could be on the market, that “at least three years” covers longer periods, and that companies should consider keeping records for as long as drug products made with the API may be on the market.⁹
5Cell and gene therapies keep traceability data longer.
The EU GMP guidelines for advanced therapy medicinal products apply the same batch documentation periods, with five years after the last clinical trial for investigational products. Their traceability data, which link each donation to the batch and the recipient, are kept “for a minimum of 30 years after the expiry date of the product”, unless the marketing authorisation sets a longer period.¹⁰
6Keeping records usable for the whole period.
A retention period is only met if the record can still be read and trusted at the end of it. Part 11 requires closed systems to protect electronic records “to enable their accurate and ready retrieval throughout the records retention period”, and to keep audit trails for at least as long as the records they cover.¹¹ In the EU, a manufacturer that keeps documentation electronically must first validate the system to show the data will be stored appropriately for the anticipated period, protect the data by duplication or back-up, and maintain audit trails.⁵ Chapter 4 asks for it to be clearly defined which record relates to each activity and where it is kept, with secure controls on integrity throughout the retention period.⁷
7How it runs in Seal.
In Seal, an electronic batch record records the form version it ran on and becomes a signed, searchable record of what actually happened, and its audit history preserves original and changed values, reasons, users and times. Procedures behind the batch keep one effective version with every earlier version and its approvals retained, as document control describes.
For records that already exist on paper, Neil reads scanned paper records into values, each linked to the place on the page it came from, and the scan stays with them. Whether a scan stands in for the paper original is your quality unit’s decision under your retention procedure.
References
- 121 CFR 211.180, General requirements, eCFR. https:/
/ www. ecfr. gov/ current/ title- 21/ section- 211. 180 (read 6 November 2026) - 221 CFR 600.12, Records, eCFR. https:/
/ www. ecfr. gov/ current/ title- 21/ chapter- I/ subchapter- F/ part- 600/ subpart- B/ section- 600. 12 (read 6 November 2026) - 321 CFR 1271.270, Records, eCFR. https:/
/ www. ecfr. gov/ current/ title- 21/ chapter- I/ subchapter- L/ part- 1271/ subpart- D/ section- 1271. 270 (read 6 November 2026) - 421 CFR 312.57, Recordkeeping and record retention, eCFR. https:/
/ www. ecfr. gov/ current/ title- 21/ chapter- I/ subchapter- D/ part- 312/ subpart- D/ section- 312. 57 (read 6 November 2026) - 5Commission Directive (EU) 2017/1572 of 15 September 2017 on the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice for medicinal products for human use, EUR-Lex. https:/
/ eur- lex. europa. eu/ legal- content/ EN/ TXT/ ?uri=CELEX:32017L1572 (read 6 November 2026) - 6Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1569 of 23 May 2017 on good manufacturing practice for investigational medicinal products for human use, EUR-Lex. https:/
/ eur- lex. europa. eu/ legal- content/ EN/ TXT/ ?uri=CELEX:32017R1569 (read 6 November 2026) - 7EudraLex Volume 4, Chapter 4: Documentation, European Commission, in operation 30 June 2011. https:/
/ health. ec. europa. eu/ system/ files/ 2016- 11/ chapter4_ 01- 2011_ en_ 0. pdf (read 6 November 2026) - 8ICH Q7, Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, ICH, 10 November 2000. https:/
/ database. ich. org/ sites/ default/ files/ Q7%20Guideline. pdf (read 6 November 2026) - 9ICH Q7 Guideline: Questions and Answers, ICH, 10 June 2015. https:/
/ database. ich. org/ sites/ default/ files/ Q7_ Q%26As_ Q%26As. pdf (read 6 November 2026) - 10EudraLex Volume 4, Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practice specific to Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, European Commission, 22 November 2017. https:/
/ health. ec. europa. eu/ document/ download/ ad33d9dd- 03f0- 4bef- af53- 21308ce2187d_ en?filename=2017_ 11_ 22_ guidelines_ gmp_ for_ atmps. pdf (read 6 November 2026) - 1121 CFR 11.10, Controls for closed systems, eCFR. https:/
/ www. ecfr. gov/ current/ title- 21/ chapter- I/ subchapter- A/ part- 11/ subpart- B/ section- 11. 10 (read 6 November 2026)
AQuestions and answers
What does 21 CFR 211.180(c) require?
It requires every record that Part 211 requires, or a copy, to be readily available for authorised inspection during the retention period at the site where the work was done, and open to photocopying or other reproduction. A record that can be retrieved immediately from another location by computer meets the requirement.
Can we keep scanned copies instead of the paper originals?
US and ICH rules allow records to be kept as true copies, such as photocopies, microfilm or other accurate reproductions. The copy has to be accurate and stay readable for the full period. In the EU, an electronic system used instead of paper must first be validated to show the data will be stored properly for that period.
How long are investigational batch records kept?
In the EU, the batch documentation and product specification file are kept for at least five years after the last clinical trial that used the batch is completed or discontinued. In the US, 21 CFR 312.57 has the sponsor keep its records of the drug’s receipt, shipment and disposition for two years after a marketing application is approved or, if none is approved, two years after investigational shipment stops and FDA has been notified.
What does “completely distributed” mean for an API with a retest date?
The ICH Q7 questions and answers take it to mean that the API manufacturer has distributed the whole batch to the next party in the supply chain; for a broker or distributor, the whole quantity it received. The three years run from then, and ICH suggests keeping records for as long as products made with the API may be on the market.
Do validation and stability data have to be kept as long as batch records?
EU GMP asks for critical documentation that supports the marketing authorisation, including validation and stability raw data, to be kept while the authorisation is in force. Raw data superseded by a full new data set may be retired with a documented justification, but process validation raw data should be kept at least as long as the records of every batch released on the basis of that validation.
Do audit trails have to be kept as long as the records?
Yes. Part 11 requires audit trail documentation for electronic records to be kept for at least as long as the records themselves and to be available for FDA to review and copy. EU law also requires audit trails on electronically stored GMP documentation.
