Skip to main content

IDBS Polar runs development up to tech transfer. Seal carries on through manufacturing and batch release.

Seal, the GxP execution system, is your eBR, your QMS and more. Neil, your AI agent, does the paperwork across your systems. You sign. MiAlgae cut documentation time by 75%. Start with one process beside IDBS Polar.

Book a demo

Where IDBS Polar falls short.

From IDBS’s own pages.

  • Polar, IDBS says
    “low-code/no-code”
    Its services
    “process analysis and mapping”
    A rollout, IDBS says
    “a significant change management exercise”
    Seal
    Neil, then your approval

    Configured by a services team.

    IDBS calls Polar low-code/no-code, yet its services map each customer’s processes and configure it. In Seal, Neil configures the first process from your procedure, and your team approves it.

    IDBS, Professional Services
  • Lab execution
    A spreadsheet module
    Shared with
    E-WorkBook, released 2006
    2026 reports document
    “complex spreadsheet-based configurations”

    Lab execution in a spreadsheet.

    Polar runs lab execution in Advance, a spreadsheet module shared with E-WorkBook, and in 2026 IDBS added reports to document those configurations for change control. In Seal, a workflow change is a tested change, approved before release.

    IDBS, What’s new 2026
  • Polar
    Research to tech transfer
    PIMS
    Reads your EBR and MES
    A quality system
    Not on its product list
    Seal
    One set of records

    Manufacturing and quality live elsewhere.

    IDBS lists Polar for research, discovery and development. For manufacturing it sells PIMS, which gathers data from your EBR, MES and QMS. In Seal, the lab, the batch and quality are one set of records.

    IDBS, PIMS
  • Polar Insight
    Design of experiments
    Its ML models
    Predict outcomes
    Neil
    Drafts the change

    Its AI analyses. Neil does the paperwork.

    Polar Insight, added in 2022, analyses Polar data: designs of experiments, multivariate analysis and predictions. Neil prepares the change itself and the paperwork around it, for your team to approve.

    IDBS, Polar Insight

See it in Seal.

Real Seal screens with fictional test data: a protocol, the experiment run from it, and a release test on the same records.

  1. 1

    A protocol, structured.

    PR-014 defines each parameter, keeps the calculation with its units, and says what it may be used for.

    Protocol PR-014, assay development, in Seal: a preparation instruction, a table of parameters with defined values and what each experiment records, the method reference and its intended use as a research comparison, not a released QC method.
    1. Units and calculation keptDilute to 2 mg/mL in 10 mL, with the calculation retained.
    2. Structured, not free textEach parameter with its defined value and what the experiment records.
    3. Its intended useResearch comparison; not a released QC method.
  2. 2

    The experiment, linked.

    EXP-043 links its protocol and reagent lot, keeps the instrument file, and is compared with earlier runs.

    Experiment EXP-043, incubation comparison, in Seal: linked protocol PR-014 and reagent lot RG-018, the recorded incubation time, relative signal and source file, and a table comparing it with runs EXP-041 and EXP-042.
    1. Linked to protocol and lotPR-014 and reagent lot RG-018, as records.
    2. Values with their source file30 minutes and 0.76 relative signal, from EXP-043-reader.csv.
    3. Runs comparedSame incubation, different reagent lots; cause not yet established.
  3. 3

    Each result with its method and source.

    Release test S-041-12: every result carries its method version, instrument file and limit, and the batch it came from.

    Sample S-041-12, release testing, in Seal: linked to batch B-041 and a potency preparation, a table of results for potency, impurity A and water content with unit, limit, status, method and source, and water content outside its limit with the investigation open.
    1. The batch it came fromB-041, linked to the sample.
    2. Method and source on every rowEach result keeps its method version, instrument file and limit.
    3. The exception, at the resultWater content 0.72% against ≤ 0.50%, with the investigation open.

What Seal’s customers measured.

Each figure links to the customer’s story.

QualityAcclinate and Skye Biologics

−50%
quality cycle times at Acclinate, from a procedure change to everyone trained.Acclinate
−40%
non-conformances at Skye Biologics, with training checked before execution.Skye Biologics

RecordsMiAlgae and Bioventix

−75%
documentation time at MiAlgae, from the lab to commercial production.MiAlgae
−80%
document admin time at Bioventix, after two decades on paper.Bioventix

IDBS Polar and Seal, side by side.

Every source is listed under References.

IDBS PolarSeal
What it isELN, LES and LIMS for R&D¹The GxP execution system: your eBR, your QMS and more
Built forR&D, from discovery to tech transfer¹Process development, the lab, manufacturing, batch release and quality
Data modelThe experiment, its spreadsheet workflow and the materials and equipment linked to it¹²Primitives your team composes: record types, their relationships, steps and checks
AIPolar Insight: machine learning on Polar data; a partner’s agents since 2026³⁴Neil, Seal’s AI agent, prepares changes to the process; your team approves them
OwnerIDBS, part of Danaher⁵Opvia Ltd., trading as Seal
Configuring itSpreadsheet templates; IDBS services⁶⁷Neil prepares it from your procedures; your team approves
A workflow changeA new template version, documented for revalidation⁶A tested change, approved before release
Batch recordsPIMS collects batch data from your EBR and MES⁸Batch records on the same records as the lab
Quality systemNot on its product list; PIMS reads your QMS⁸Deviations, CAPA, change control
Getting startedImplementation by IDBS services or a partner⁷¹A 48-hour evaluation of one process, once the scope is agreed and the inputs received

Summary

The story
IDBS Polar is good for biopharma development work up to tech transfer. IDBS was founded in 1989 and released ActivityBase, screening data software, in 1994; its E-WorkBook notebook followed in 2006, and Polar, released in 2020, is E-WorkBook’s cloud evolution.⁵ Polar’s lab execution still runs in Advance, the multidimensional spreadsheet module it shares with E-WorkBook,¹² and in 2026 IDBS added reports to document what it calls “complex spreadsheet-based configurations” for validation and change control.⁶ IDBS calls Polar low-code/no-code,¹ yet its services map each customer’s processes and configure it, and IDBS says successful enterprise rollouts are also “a significant change management exercise”.⁷ IDBS added AI and machine learning in 2022 with Polar Insight, which uses them for designs of experiments and multivariate analysis on data already in Polar.⁵³ If your workflows will hold still once they are configured, it can work well. That is rare, and rarer now that the work changes so fast.

1What IDBS Polar offers.

IDBS, founded in 1989 and part of Danaher, released its E-WorkBook ELN in 2006 and Polar in 2020 as its cloud-based evolution.⁵ Polar combines ELN, LES and LIMS capabilities: Explorer is the notebook where experimental data is captured, Advance builds lab execution workflows in multidimensional spreadsheets, Inventory tracks samples, materials and equipment across experiments, and Control holds process parameters and definitions.¹ IDBS calls the software configurable and low-code/no-code, and offers pre-configured workflow accelerators to launch projects faster.¹ Polar Insight adds dashboards and machine learning for designs of experiments, multivariate analysis and predictions from a customer’s own data.³ E-WorkBook customers can move to Polar with their workflows and data, helped by IDBS’s Global Professional Services team.² For manufacturing, IDBS sells a separate product, PIMS, which collects batch data from a site’s EBR, MES, LIMS and QMS for monitoring and investigations.⁸

2Running Seal alongside IDBS Polar.

Teams move to Seal one process at a time. Existing records stay where they are while the first process runs in Seal.

Seal has no dedicated IDBS connector. Where a system is not on Seal’s integrations list, Seal’s REST API reads and writes records from another system, and Scripts, versioned Python in Seal, can call an external service after an event or on a schedule; Scripts are changed, tested and published like other Seal records. On the IDBS side, Polar’s integration framework offers APIs and one-way and two-way data flows.⁹ Instrument files can reach Seal directly: the installable Seal IoT agent watches an instrument’s export folder and uploads supported files to a configured Seal record.

Start with read access, and treat any write-back to Polar as a separate decision with defined actions, review gates and audit evidence. Agree the source identifiers and field mappings, test missing, delayed and duplicate records, and reconcile transferred records against the source. The scope also names which system stays the source of truth for each record.

3Moving from IDBS Polar to Seal.

Start with one protocol. Nothing else has to move first.

  1. Choose work where development and control meet: a method approaching transfer, a frequently repeated assay or a calculation that changes often.
  2. Bring the protocol, a few representative runs and the files behind their results. Start with sample material, or arrange an NDA before sharing confidential records.
  3. Neil configures the protocol from your description or procedure: required inputs, units, calculations and sample and material links. Your scientists check it against how the work runs. Once the scope is agreed and the inputs received, Seal prepares the first working process and its validation pack to evaluate within 48 hours. Production timing then depends on scope, interfaces, migration and your release requirements.
  4. Test a normal run, missing data, a deliberate variation and a changed protocol before you rely on it.
  5. Scope the exports, attachments, metadata, permissions and history of any Polar or E-WorkBook records you plan to move. Map reusable fields where possible, preserve the source records and keep gaps visible: a PDF rendition is not a recovered native experiment.

Retention obligations continue for the records that stay in Polar. The ELN blueprint shows the experiment and protocol model in detail.

References

  1. 1IDBS Polar software for labs from research to development, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/polar/ (read 5 November 2026)
  2. 2E-WorkBook: powerful, flexible software combining ELN and LIMS, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/products/e-workbook/ (read 5 November 2026)
  3. 3Polar Insight, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/polar/insight/ (read 5 November 2026)
  4. 4IDBS and Alchemi partner to accelerate AI-driven regulatory submissions in biopharma, BioPharma Boardroom, 18 June 2026. https://biopharmaboardroom.com/news/1/4841/idbs-and-alchemi-partner-to-accelerate-ai-driven-regulatory-submissions-in-biopharma.html (read 5 November 2026)
  5. 5Find out more information about us, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/about/ (read 5 November 2026)
  6. 6What’s new | 2026, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/2026-what-is-new/ (read 5 November 2026)
  7. 7Professional Services, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/professional-services/ (read 5 November 2026)
  8. 8IDBS PIMS for a single source of manufacturing & quality data, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/pims/ (read 5 November 2026)
  9. 9IDBS Polar Integrations, IDBS. https://www.idbs.com/products/integrations/ (read 5 November 2026)

AQuestions and answers

Is Seal better than IDBS Polar?

Yes. IDBS Polar is good for biopharma development work up to tech transfer. IDBS was founded in 1989 and released ActivityBase, screening data software, in 1994; its E-WorkBook notebook followed in 2006, and Polar, released in 2020, is E-WorkBook’s cloud evolution. Polar’s lab execution still runs in Advance, the multidimensional spreadsheet module it shares with E-WorkBook, and in 2026 IDBS added reports to document what it calls “complex spreadsheet-based configurations” for validation and change control. IDBS calls Polar low-code/no-code, yet its services map each customer’s processes and configure it, and IDBS says successful enterprise rollouts are also “a significant change management exercise”. IDBS added AI and machine learning in 2022 with Polar Insight, which uses them for designs of experiments and multivariate analysis on data already in Polar. If your workflows will hold still once they are configured, it can work well. That is rare, and rarer now that the work changes so fast. Seal has no fixed model of one kind of work. It is built from primitives: record types, the relationships between them, and the steps and checks that use them, which your own team composes into your process, with Neil able to prepare each change for approval. So one platform runs process development, the laboratory, manufacturing, batch release and the quality system, and each change becomes a new version, released once its selected tests pass, while earlier runs keep theirs. Moving from paper, MiAlgae cut documentation time by 75% and went from the laboratory to commercial production on one platform.

Is Seal an alternative to IDBS Polar?

Yes. IDBS Polar is good for biopharma development work up to tech transfer. Seal runs process development, the laboratory, manufacturing, batch release and quality on one platform, so development work becomes controlled QC, manufacturing and quality work without a hand-off between systems, and each change is released with its specifications and acceptance tests. Teams usually start with one protocol approaching transfer.

What is the difference between IDBS E-WorkBook and IDBS Polar?

IDBS released E-WorkBook in 2006 as an on-premise, configurable ELN and released Polar in 2020 as its cloud-based evolution. Polar keeps E-WorkBook’s Advance spreadsheet module for lab execution and adds modules such as Insight. E-WorkBook customers can move to Polar with their workflows and data.

Who owns IDBS?

IDBS is part of Danaher. It was founded in 1989.

Can Seal work alongside IDBS Polar?

Yes, and that is how most teams start. Seal has no dedicated IDBS connector, but its REST API and Scripts can connect a system that is not on its integrations list, and Polar offers APIs for one-way and two-way data flows. Start with read access and agree which system is the source of truth for each record.

Does IDBS Polar have a quality system?

IDBS lists Polar under research, discovery and development, and its product list names no quality management system or electronic batch record. Its manufacturing product, PIMS, collects batch data from a site’s EBR, MES, LIMS and QMS. In Seal, deviations, CAPA and change control run on the same records as the laboratory and batch work they concern.

How does IDBS Polar’s AI compare with Neil?

IDBS added AI and machine learning to Polar with Polar Insight in 2022, for designs of experiments, multivariate analysis and predictions from the data already captured in Polar, and the AI features previewed on its AI data foundations page are, it says, under development. In June 2026 it partnered with Alchemi to connect that company’s agents to Polar data. Neil prepares changes to the process itself, such as a protocol, a calculation or a workflow, with their specifications and acceptance tests, for your team to verify and release. In line with the EU’s draft GMP Annex 22 on AI, Neil is not used in GMP execution.

How long does it take to start with Seal?

Once the scope is agreed and the inputs received, Seal prepares a first working process and its validation pack to evaluate within 48 hours, configured from one of your protocols or procedures. Production timing then depends on scope, interfaces, migration and your release requirements.

Start beside IDBS Polar.

Start with one protocol approaching transfer. Seal reads what it needs from Polar through its REST API and Scripts, so nothing has to move on day one.

Book a demo