Compare the process history around this batch exception.
Once the connection is configured, I’ll use the records it provides and cite each one. Anything it doesn’t supply stays listed as missing.
Aspen InfoPlus.21
Process history review
- Time-aligned readings, quality flags and batch references
- Missing or unmatched information
- Next steps for your team to review
1What’s connected.
Bring InfoPlus.21 process history into batch and quality reviews in Seal through a scoped integration with the historian’s interfaces, or through exported files collected with the Seal IoT app. Agree the tags, time windows, units and quality flags with site IT before implementation.
Connection setup and permissions
Connect through Seal’s IoT app or a scoped integration. The equipment model, software version and available interfaces determine the connection method.
Related blueprints
2Start with the job.
Tell us what Neil needs to do and which records it needs. We’ll confirm the interface, permissions and implementation scope with your team.
3Before it goes live.
Access and any write-back
Define which records are in scope and whose permissions apply. Whether the connection writes back at all is a separate decision, with its own mapping and approval.
Data and failure handling
Agree the field mapping, identifiers, units and source of record. Test missing or duplicate data, interrupted transfers and recovery before relying on the connection.
Verification and release
Review the configured connection for its intended use. Keep the requirements, checks and evidence with the change, and approve the release through your team’s controls.