Bring the procedure your team relies on today. Its steps, checks, review gates, signatures, training, and validation evidence will run together in Seal — in a live workspace your team can inspect and execute, not a mockup.
Transform one procedure→Start with a sample, or your own process after an NDA. Production rollout still follows your security and validation controls.
The source stays attached to what runs.
Seal does not turn an SOP into another document. It turns each clause into executable steps, checks, review gates, and evidence — then carries the approved source through to the released version.
SourceSOP-QA-017 / rev 06
Line clearance before batch start
4.2Verify the previous product and labels are removed
4.4Confirm equipment status before the line opens
5.1Record the area release against the batch
5.3Require QA approval before execution begins
→
ProposedCS-017 / by neil
A reviewable change set
18
executable steps
7
evidence fields
3
review gates
Source mapping
Clause 4.2Operator clearance check
Clause 4.4Equipment status enforced
Clause 5.1Area release captured
Clause 5.3QA gate blocks execution
Nothing publishes until your quality team reviews the diff and signs.
→
LiveSOP-QA-017 / v01
A controlled execution record
RUN-001Ready for operators
AreaSUITE-02✓
Previous lotcleared✓
Equipmentreleased✓
QA releasee-signed✓
Training
12 assigned
Validation
Pack complete
Representative proof: every executable step remains traceable to the source clause your team approved.
Most of the 48 hours belong to your team.
neil's first proposal takes 2h 30m. The other 45h 30m belongs to your review, validation, signatures, and training.
Elapsed
Work
At handoff
0–2h 30m
neil proposes the build
neil reads the source, maps each clause, and proposes the steps, fields, calculations, checks, and review gates as one diff.
Reviewable change set
2h 30m–26h
Your team challenges and approves it
The process owner and QA inspect the mapping, refine the workflow, and close every comment. Nothing publishes without their signatures.
Signed approval
26–40h
Seal compiles the validation evidence
Tests, traceability, configuration, change history, and review records compile from the same build your team approved.
Validation pack
40–48h
Training, e-signature, and release
The approved version is pinned, operators receive training, and execution stays gated until every required control is complete.
Version live
The second change does not start over.
The approved mapping, tests, training rules, and evidence stay with the process. Later changes inherit that proof instead of rebuilding it.
Add a product specification
one quarter→hours
Update a method parameter
2–6 weeks→minutes
Scope revalidation
whole system→specific change
The hard questions.
No. It's your process in a real Seal workspace: executable steps, in-process checks, review gates, e-signatures, an audit trail, and the validation pack. Your team can log in and run it.
You do not upload anything on the site. Start with a sample, or use your own representative process after an NDA. If you use your own document, it's treated as confidential and used only to build your proof.
Bring them all if you want to use your own process. One document is enough for the proof, but neil composes from many: a procedure plus its forms, specs, and the spreadsheet that actually runs the process today.
A sample process or one representative document, plus about an hour with the person who owns the process. If what you see doesn't convince you, you walk away.
You run the workflow and judge it. If you want to go further, we scope your first production process together, and the proof becomes the start of your validated workspace rather than a throwaway pilot.
Don't evaluate the promise. Evaluate your process.
Use a sample or your own document under NDA. If the running workflow at hour 48 does not convince you, walk away.