Bring a master batch record, manufacturing procedure, work instruction, method, or protocol. Its steps, checks, review gates, signatures, training, and validation evidence will run together in Seal — in a live workspace your team can inspect and execute, not a mockup.
Start with one process→Start with a sample, or your own process after an NDA. Production rollout still follows your security and validation controls.
The source stays attached to what runs.
Seal does not turn your controlled documents into more static documents. It turns their requirements into executable steps, checks, review gates, and evidence — then keeps the approved source attached to the released workflow.
SourceSOP-QA-017 / rev 06
Line clearance before batch start
4.2Verify the previous product and labels are removed
4.4Confirm equipment status before the line opens
5.1Record the area release against the batch
5.3Require QA approval before execution begins
→
ProposedCS-017 / by neil
A reviewable change set
18
executable steps
7
evidence fields
3
review gates
Source mapping
Clause 4.2Operator clearance check
Clause 4.4Equipment status enforced
Clause 5.1Area release captured
Clause 5.3QA gate blocks execution
Nothing publishes until your quality team reviews the diff and signs.
→
LiveSOP-QA-017 / v01
A controlled execution record
RUN-001Ready for operators
AreaSUITE-02✓
Previous lotcleared✓
Equipmentreleased✓
QA releasee-signed✓
Training
12 assigned
Validation
Pack complete
Representative proof: every executable step remains traceable to the source clause your team approved.
Most of the 48 hours belong to your team.
neil's first proposal takes 2h 30m. The rest is for review, testing, iteration, and your team's hands-on evaluation.
Elapsed
Work
At handoff
0–2h 30m
neil proposes the build
neil reads the source, maps each clause, and proposes the steps, fields, calculations, checks, and review gates as one diff.
Reviewable change set
2h 30m–26h
Your team reviews the workflow
The process owner and QA inspect the mapping, challenge assumptions, and refine the workflow. Nothing is treated as production-approved.
Reviewed workflow
26–40h
Seal runs and records the tests
Seal executes representative paths and compiles the test results, traceability, configuration, and change history for your team to inspect.
Recorded test run
40–48h
Your team runs it in Seal
Representative users execute the process, inspect the audit trail, and decide whether to take the workflow through validation and production release.
Workflow running in Seal
The second change does not start over.
The approved mapping, tests, training rules, and evidence stay with the process. Later changes inherit that proof instead of rebuilding it.
Add a product specification
one quarter→hours
Update a method parameter
2–6 weeks→minutes
Scope revalidation
whole system→specific change
The hard questions.
No. It's your process in a real Seal workspace: executable steps, in-process checks, review gates, e-signatures, an audit trail, and the validation pack. Your team can log in and run it.
You do not upload anything on the site. Start with a sample, or use your own representative process after an NDA. If you use your own document, it's treated as confidential and used only to build your proof.
Bring them all if you want to use your own process. One document is enough for the proof, but neil composes from many: a procedure plus its forms, specs, and the spreadsheet that actually runs the process today.
A sample process or one representative document, plus about an hour with the person who owns the process. If what you see doesn't convince you, you walk away.
You run the workflow and judge it. If you want to go further, we scope your first production process together, and the proof becomes the start of your validated workspace rather than a throwaway pilot.
Don't evaluate the promise. Evaluate your process.
Use a sample or your own document under NDA. If the running workflow at hour 48 does not convince you, walk away.