The five-day clock started Monday. By Thursday you realized it was reportable. One day left. Intake triage that identifies critical complaints immediately, not after the queue.

A surgeon reports that a device shut off during a procedure. Monday morning. The person who took the call is on vacation Tuesday. Nobody reviews it until Wednesday. Thursday, someone reads the notes and realizes: this might be reportable.
The clock started Monday. You have five days. It's now Thursday. You've used four days to figure out that you have a reporting window.
Most complaints are routine—dented packaging, usage questions. One in a hundred might indicate a serious safety issue. If your system treats them all first-in-first-out, that serious complaint waits behind ninety-nine minor ones.
Seal triages at intake. "Death or serious injury?" "Device malfunction during use?" The answers determine classification. Critical complaints don't wait in queues. They escalate immediately.
One battery complaint is an anomaly. Three is a cluster. Eight across three lot numbers is systemic.
The person handling complaint eight doesn't know about complaints one through seven. They're in different files, assigned to different investigators.
Seal analyzes complaints across products, lots, symptoms, and time. When complaints cluster, the system alerts quality leadership.
MDR: 5 days for death or serious injury, 30 days for malfunctions that could cause harm. When an event is reportable, Seal calculates the deadline based on when you became aware. The countdown is visible on dashboards. As the deadline approaches, escalation intensifies.
Complaint from Germany. Same day, another from Brazil. A week later, Japan and Australia. Four regulatory systems, four different reporting requirements, four different deadlines.
When a complaint is classified, the system shows which regulatory reports are required based on where the event occurred and where the product is marketed.
