Nova BioProfile FLEX2 culture results — first-run working review WORKING NOTES — review decisions belong in your controlled records. Guide: https://seal.run/integrations/nova-bioprofile-flex2 Use this with the Nova BioProfile FLEX2 culture results first-run procedure. Retain the actual configuration and evidence, then record what happened in each receiving exercise. Expected behavior is printed as a prompt; your observed result starts blank. 1. Installed configuration and source route Record the installed software, exact export headers, selected Historical Results population and source reports. Describe the owner and mechanism that produce a consistent closed handoff before collection. Identify separately required QC/image evidence. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 2. Identity and expected population Match each entry to its analyzer, actual source identity, sample, vessel and independent physical collection. Record repeated-measurement and later-evaluation relationships. For overlapping snapshots, list expected entries, unique analyses and repeated deliveries. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 3. Quantity and receiving evidence Check density scale, percentage and chemistry units independently. Record preparation evidence and whether each applicable correction is already included. Preserve missing/qualified results and keep collection time separate from analysis/evaluation time. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 4. Exercise 1: Two files overlap Input: Deliver the worked handoffs, then replay handoff-02.csv. Expected: Two analyses remain. The new arrival is traceable, and its A-101 and A-102 entries resolve to the intended existing results. Record the actual input/evidence references, observed result, whether it matches the expectation and any unresolved issue. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 5. Exercise 2: The density correction is already included Input: Provide the worked 4.8 million cells/mL result and factor 2 with explicit already-corrected evidence. Expected: The destination contains 4,800,000 cells/mL, not 9,600,000. Viability and glucose retain their separately defined quantities. Record the actual input/evidence references, observed result, whether it matches the expectation and any unresolved issue. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 6. Exercise 3: The source contains no valid lactate number Input: Use the unavailable lactate entry alongside valid glucose. Expected: Glucose remains usable under its own rules. Lactate is missing with its source state, and the sample is not presented as a complete numeric analyte panel. Record the actual input/evidence references, observed result, whether it matches the expectation and any unresolved issue. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 7. Exercise 4: A later evaluation shares the original collection Input: Deliver a supported reanalysis with a later evaluation time and the same physical collection evidence. Expected: Both evaluations remain attributable to S-301. The culture timeline still uses the 09:00 collection, and the reviewer can identify the selected evaluation and its supporting evidence. Record the actual input/evidence references, observed result, whether it matches the expectation and any unresolved issue. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] 8. Implementation review and next work Identify the configuration/mapping revision tested, reviewer, open issues and owner for each next action. Cite the retained source and destination evidence. A filled note is not itself an accepted test; record the review decision through your actual process. Your evidence and observations: [Not recorded] EVIDENCE NEEDED TO FINISH Overlapping handoffs reconcile to the expected unique analysis population, source quantities retain their independent meanings, and culture comparison uses supported collection events. Incomplete copies, missing results and later evaluations remain visible with recovery owners.