AM-014 revision-4 readiness matrix
Filled fictional example — adapt to your procedure and actual evidence.

SOURCE PACK
- The revision-impact assessment and the task population it covers.
- Each person’s procedure acknowledgement, required practical evidence and recorded assessment outcome.

FINDINGS
Population: Three AM-014 assignments. AM-022 is a separate method population even where the people are the same.
J. Patel: Revision 4 acknowledged; practical assessment recorded; authorised for AM-014 in the demo.
M. Chen: Revision 3 acknowledgement; reassessment due; review required.
A. Lewis: Revision 4 acknowledged; required practical assessment not recorded; not authorised.

NEXT WORK AND CLOSURE EVIDENCE
Training assignment owner
Action: Resolve M. Chen’s revision-4 requirement under the impact plan.
Evidence needed: Applicable revision evidence and the required reassessment, or a supported equivalence decision where the plan permits it.

Practical assessor
Action: Assess A. Lewis against the required observed task.
Evidence needed: Accepted assessment evidence; an uploaded but unreviewed practice record leaves the assessment outstanding.

Task owner
Action: Check the actual method when assigning work to J. Patel.
Evidence needed: The AM-014 decision applies to that method. The demo’s AM-022 assignment remains unauthorised.

CONCLUSION
One of three AM-014 assignments has an authorised outcome. The next work is different for the other two people; sending both another generic acknowledgement task would fail to address the missing practical evidence.

WORKED EVIDENCE REVIEW
Turn the changed step into something an assessor can observe.
For a separate fictional training exercise, suppose the AM-014 revision-4 impact plan adds an equipment-configuration check before starting the method. Describe the changed task, the evidence an assessor must see and the response to an incorrect configuration. The rubric below illustrates that design; it is not the content of the method or a practice assessment shown in the native demonstration screenshot.
Apply the agreed rubric to each person-method assignment. J. Patel’s recorded authorization should link to the accepted evidence required by the plan. M. Chen’s revision-3 completion does not demonstrate the new task. A. Lewis’s revision-4 acknowledgement establishes reading, while the required practice assessment remains outstanding. An assessor can accept evidence only after evaluating it; an uploaded file or attendance timestamp does not supply the result of that evaluation.
If practice reveals a missed step, record the observed gap and the next learning or reassessment action. Preserve the initial outcome when a later attempt succeeds. If the impact owner accepts earlier evidence as equivalent, retain the comparison to the changed requirement and the decision’s scope so the next reviewer can understand why another attempt was unnecessary.
For human-medicine manufacturing, EU GMP Chapter 2 §2.11 describes training appropriate to assigned duties, periodic assessment of its practical effectiveness and retained training records. The worked rubric translates a fictional changed task into observable evidence; the source does not prescribe this rubric or require the same assessment for every revision.
European Commission: GMP Chapter 2, §2.11: https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/11f4f8e6-a6e9-4897-afe3-f21e1dc56cb8_en?filename=2014-03_chapter_2.pdf
Illustrative rubric for one changed setup task
Observed task: Locate the assigned instruction
Evidence to retain: Person, method and exact revision used in the exercise
Outcome requiring more work: Uses a superseded revision or cannot identify the assigned one
Observed task: Check the configured setup against the instruction
Evidence to retain: Observed comparison, equipment identity and assessor notes
Outcome requiring more work: Accepts a deliberately mismatched test configuration
Observed task: Respond to a setup mismatch
Evidence to retain: Observed stop/escalation under the chosen training procedure
Outcome requiring more work: Proceeds without resolving the mismatch
Observed task: Record the exercise result
Evidence to retain: Dated assessor decision tied to this attempt and rubric
Outcome requiring more work: Evidence submitted but no assessment decision yet